您好,登錄后才能下訂單哦!
本篇內(nèi)容主要講解“如何理解php MessagePack”,感興趣的朋友不妨來看看。本文介紹的方法操作簡單快捷,實(shí)用性強(qiáng)。下面就讓小編來帶大家學(xué)習(xí)“如何理解php MessagePack”吧!
1,今天在hacknews上看到很多人對(duì)messagepack的爭論。首先了解什么是MessagePack:MessagePack is a binary-based efficient object serialization library. It enables to exchange structured objects between many languages like JSON. But unlike JSON, it is very fast and small.
2,MessagePack的主要用途,作者解釋說有兩大用途:一是Space-efficient storage for Memcache entries (Pinterest),節(jié)省空間類型的mamcache應(yīng)用;另一個(gè)是用于RPC傳輸, This use case is fairly close to my original intent. When one is designing an RPC system, one of the first tasks is to specify and implement a communication protocol. This process can get pretty hairy as you need to worry about a lot of low-level issues like Endian-ness. By using MessagePack, one can skip designing and implementing a communication protocol entirely and accelerate development.
3,爭議的地方是MessagePack的benchmark說,他比protocolBuffer,Json快很多倍。但是有人不相信,做個(gè)javasript下的測(cè)試(json與messagePack)。發(fā)現(xiàn)MessagePack僅是壓縮后的數(shù)據(jù)比json少10%左右,而壓縮和解壓時(shí)間則和json的解析器比起來要費(fèi)時(shí)很多。
4,“MsgPack vs. JSON: Cut your client-server exchange traffic by 50% with one line of code”這篇文章使用了messagePack做服務(wù)器的優(yōu)化,降低服務(wù)器的數(shù)據(jù)量,更加合理的利用帶寬。作者強(qiáng)調(diào)了他們寧愿浪費(fèi)客戶端的0.5ms—1ms,但是服務(wù)器使用ruby的MessagePack解析器,效率能夠比JSON快5倍。
The difference to JSON is, that MsgPack is binary-based - this gives the possibility to make the exchanged data a) smaller and use less bytes, I guess we all know the advantages of that, however there is an even bigger advantage: b) It is faster to parse and encode, having a parser parse 40 bytes takes about twice as long as parsing 20 bytes.
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
myJSONString = JSON.stringify(myObject);
myObject = JSON.parse(myJSONString);
var myByteArray = msgpack.pack(myObject);
myObject = msgpack.unpack(myByteArray);
MessagePack作者也認(rèn)為MessagePack may not be the best choice for client-side serialization as described by the blog author.引用2的作者有點(diǎn)小悲劇。
5,BSon是Json的二進(jìn)制形式,但是與JSon有語法不兼容的地方。但是MessagePack保證語義上能夠做到一致。
6,場(chǎng)景需求不同,導(dǎo)致技術(shù)的應(yīng)用有所差異。
PHP試用MessagePack
It's like JSON. but fast and small.
這句吸引了我,去瞧了下。
官網(wǎng):http://msgpack.org
官方的安裝方法忽悠人,msgpack目錄下根本沒php目錄...只看到csharp,erlang,go,java,ruby等目錄。
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
git clone https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack.git
cd msgpack/php
phpize
./configure && make && make install
還是在PHP官網(wǎng)擴(kuò)展找到了:http://pecl.php.net/package/msgpack
最后更新時(shí)間:2012-09-14,昨天的版本。
附安裝過程:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
wget http://pecl.php.net/get/msgpack-0.5.2.tgz
tar zxf msgpack-0.5.2.tgz
cd msgpack-0.5.2
/usr/local/hx/php/bin/phpize
./configure --with-php-config=/usr/local/hx/php/bin/php-config
make && make install
然后把msgpack.so加到php.ini里,重啟php,完成安裝。
開始測(cè)試:
$data = array(0=>'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz',1=>'廈門','abc'=>'1234567890');
分別對(duì)其msgpack_pack,json_encode,serialize,長度為:50,62,87
然后分別執(zhí)行10000次,耗時(shí):9.95 毫秒,17.45 毫秒,8.85 毫秒
解開執(zhí)行10000次,耗時(shí):14.76 毫秒,23.93 毫秒,14.61 毫秒
msgpack的性能至少超過json50%,雖然和serialize其實(shí)速度差不多,但serialize占用空間明顯比較多。
另外,GBK的程序方便了,中文也可以msgpack_pack,用json的話還要批量轉(zhuǎn)換成utf-8之后才能json_encode。
引用:
1,MessagePack官方網(wǎng)站
2,MsgPack vs. JSON: Cut your client-server exchange traffic by 50% with one line of code
HN評(píng)論地址:http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4090831
3,My thoughts on MessagePack
HN評(píng)論地址:http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4092969
4 JS下MessagePack與JSON性能對(duì)比
到此,相信大家對(duì)“如何理解php MessagePack”有了更深的了解,不妨來實(shí)際操作一番吧!這里是億速云網(wǎng)站,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容可以進(jìn)入相關(guān)頻道進(jìn)行查詢,關(guān)注我們,繼續(xù)學(xué)習(xí)!
免責(zé)聲明:本站發(fā)布的內(nèi)容(圖片、視頻和文字)以原創(chuàng)、轉(zhuǎn)載和分享為主,文章觀點(diǎn)不代表本網(wǎng)站立場(chǎng),如果涉及侵權(quán)請(qǐng)聯(lián)系站長郵箱:is@yisu.com進(jìn)行舉報(bào),并提供相關(guān)證據(jù),一經(jīng)查實(shí),將立刻刪除涉嫌侵權(quán)內(nèi)容。