溫馨提示×

您好,登錄后才能下訂單哦!

密碼登錄×
登錄注冊(cè)×
其他方式登錄
點(diǎn)擊 登錄注冊(cè) 即表示同意《億速云用戶服務(wù)條款》

關(guān)于Spring3 + Mybatis3整合時(shí)多數(shù)據(jù)源動(dòng)態(tài)切換的問題

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2020-10-18 13:32:39 來(lái)源:腳本之家 閱讀:175 作者:兔子黨-大胡子 欄目:編程語(yǔ)言

以前的項(xiàng)目經(jīng)歷中,基本上都是spring + hibernate + Spring JDBC這種組合用的多。至于MyBatis,也就這個(gè)項(xiàng)目才開始試用,閑話不多說(shuō),進(jìn)入正題。

以前的這種框架組合中,動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)源切換可謂已經(jīng)非常成熟了,網(wǎng)上也有非常多的博客介紹,都是繼承AbstractRoutingDataSource,重寫determineCurrentLookupKey()方法。具體做法就不在此廢話了。

所以當(dāng)項(xiàng)目中碰到這個(gè)問題,我?guī)缀跸攵紱]有想,就采用了這種做法,但是一測(cè)試,一點(diǎn)反應(yīng)都沒有。當(dāng)時(shí)覺得不可能,于是斷點(diǎn),加log調(diào)試,發(fā)現(xiàn)determineCurrentLookupKey()根本沒有調(diào)用。 

為什么列? 這不可能啊。靜下心來(lái),仔細(xì)想想,才想到一個(gè)關(guān)鍵的問題: Mybatis整合Spring,而不是Spring整合的Mybatis! 直覺告訴我,問題就出在這里。

于是花時(shí)間去研究一下mybatis-spring.jar 這個(gè)包,發(fā)現(xiàn)有SqlSession這東西,很本能的就注意到了這一塊,然后大致看一下他的一些實(shí)現(xiàn)類。于是就發(fā)現(xiàn)了他的實(shí)現(xiàn)類里面有一個(gè)內(nèi)部類SqlSessionInterceptor(研究過程就不多說(shuō)了,畢竟是個(gè)痛苦的過程)

好吧,這個(gè)類的作用列,就是產(chǎn)生sessionProxy。關(guān)鍵代碼如下

final SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession( 
 SqlSessionTemplate.this.sqlSessionFactory, 
 SqlSessionTemplate.this.executorType, 
 SqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator); 

這個(gè)sqlSessionFactory 我們就很眼熟啦,是我們?cè)趕pring配置文件中配了的,是吧,也就是說(shuō)這東西是直接從我們配置文件中讀進(jìn)來(lái),但這東西,就關(guān)聯(lián)了Datasource。所以就想到,如果能把這東西,做到動(dòng)態(tài),那么數(shù)據(jù)源切換,也就動(dòng)態(tài)了。

于是第一反應(yīng)就是寫了一個(gè)類,然后在里面定義一個(gè)Map,用來(lái)存放多個(gè)SqlSessionFactory,并采用Setter方法進(jìn)行屬性注入。

public class EjsSqlSessionTemplate extends SqlSessionTemplate { 
 
 private Map<String, SqlSessionFactory> targetSqlSessionFactory = new HashMap<String, SqlSessionFactory>(); 
 public void setTargetSqlSessionFactory(Map<String, SqlSessionFactory> targetSqlSessionFactory) { 
  this.targetSqlSessionFactory = targetSqlSessionFactory; 
 } 

所以Spring的配置文件就變成了這樣:

<bean id="sqlSessionTemplate" class="com.ejushang.spider.datasource.EjsSqlSessionTemplate"> 
  <constructor-arg ref="sqlSessionFactory" /> 
  <property name="targetSqlSessionFactory"> 
   <map> 
    <entry value-ref="sqlSessionFactory" key="spider"/> 
    <entry value-ref="sqlSessionFactoryTb" key="sysinfo"/> 
   </map> 
  </property> 
 </bean> 
 <bean id="mapperScannerConfigurer" class="org.mybatis.spring.mapper.MapperScannerConfigurer"> 
  <property name="basePackage" value="com.foo.bar.**.mapper*" /> 
  <property name="sqlSessionTemplateBeanName" value="sqlSessionTemplate"/> 
 </bean> 

那么這個(gè)思想是那里來(lái)的列? 當(dāng)然就是借鑒了Spring的動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)源的思想啦,對(duì)比一下Spring動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)源的配置,看看是不是差不多?

然后重寫了個(gè)關(guān)鍵的方法:

/** 
  * 重寫得到SqlSessionFactory的方法 
  * @return 
  */ 
 @Override 
 public SqlSessionFactory getSqlSessionFactory() { 
 
  SqlSessionFactory targetSqlSessionFactory = this.targetSqlSessionFactory.get(SqlSessionContextHolder.getDataSourceKey()); 
  if (targetSqlSessionFactory != null) { 
   return targetSqlSessionFactory; 
  } else if ( this.getSqlSessionFactory() != null) { 
   return this.getSqlSessionFactory(); 
  } 
  throw new IllegalArgumentException("sqlSessionFactory or targetSqlSessionFactory must set one at least"); 
 } 

而SqlSessionContextHolder就很簡(jiǎn)單,就是一個(gè)ThreadLocal的思想

public class SqlSessionContextHolder { 
 private static final ThreadLocal<String> contextHolder = new ThreadLocal<String>(); 
 private static Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(SqlSessionContextHolder.class); 
 public static void setSessionFactoryKey(String dataSourceKey) { 
  contextHolder.set(dataSourceKey); 
 } 
 public static String getDataSourceKey() { 
  String key = contextHolder.get(); 
  logger.info("當(dāng)前線程Thread:"+Thread.currentThread().getName()+" 當(dāng)前的數(shù)據(jù)源 key is "+ key); 
  return key; 
 } 
} 

博主信心滿滿就開始測(cè)試了。。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)不行,切換不過來(lái),始終都是綁定的是構(gòu)造函數(shù)中的那個(gè)默認(rèn)的sqlSessionFactory,當(dāng)時(shí)因?yàn)榭戳艘惶煸创a,頭也有點(diǎn)暈。其實(shí)為什么列?

看看我們產(chǎn)生sessionProxy的地方代碼,他的sqlSessionFactory是直接從構(gòu)造函數(shù)來(lái)拿的。而構(gòu)造函數(shù)中的sqlSessionFactory在spring容器啟動(dòng)時(shí),就已經(jīng)初始化好了,這點(diǎn)也可以從我們Spring配置文件中得到證實(shí)。

那這個(gè)問題,怎么解決列? 于是博主便想重寫那個(gè)sqlSessionInterceptor。 擦,問題就來(lái)了,這個(gè)類是private的,沒辦法重寫啊。于是博主又只能在自己的EjsSqlSessionTemplate類中,也定義了一個(gè)內(nèi)部類,把源碼中的代碼都copy過來(lái),唯一不同的就是我不是讀取構(gòu)造函數(shù)中的sqlSessionFactory.而是每次都去調(diào)用 getSqlSessionFactory()方法。代碼如下:

final SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession(    
EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getSqlSessionFactory(),    
EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getExecutorType(),     
EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getPersistenceExceptionTranslator()); 

再試,發(fā)現(xiàn)還是不行,再找原因,又回歸到了剛才那個(gè)問題。因?yàn)槲覜]有重寫SqlSessionTemplate的構(gòu)造函數(shù),而sqlSessionProxy是在構(gòu)函數(shù)中初始化的,代碼如下:

public SqlSessionTemplate(SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory, ExecutorType executorType, 
 PersistenceExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator) { 
 notNull(sqlSessionFactory, "Property 'sqlSessionFactory' is required"); 
 notNull(executorType, "Property 'executorType' is required"); 
 this.sqlSessionFactory = sqlSessionFactory; 
 this.executorType = executorType; 
 this.exceptionTranslator = exceptionTranslator; 
 this.sqlSessionProxy = (SqlSession) newProxyInstance( 
  SqlSessionFactory.class.getClassLoader(), 
  new Class[] { SqlSession.class }, 
  new SqlSessionInterceptor()); 
} 

而SqlSessionInterceptor()這東西都是private。 所以父類壓根就不會(huì)加載我寫的那個(gè)SqlSessionInterceptor()。所以問題就出在這,那好吧,博主又重寫構(gòu)函數(shù)

public EjsSqlSessionTemplate(SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory, ExecutorType executorType, PersistenceExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator) { 
  super(getSqlSessionFactory(), executorType, exceptionTranslator); 
 } 

很明顯這段代碼是編譯不通過的,構(gòu)造函數(shù)中,怎么可能調(diào)用類實(shí)例方法列?  那怎么辦列? 又只有把父類的構(gòu)造函數(shù)copy過來(lái),那問題又有了,這些成員屬性又沒有。那又只得把他們也搬過來(lái)。。  后來(lái),這個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)源的功能,終于完成了。

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------分割線-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------整個(gè)完整的代碼如下:

1、重寫SqlSessionTemplate (重寫的過程已經(jīng)在上面分析過了)

public class EjsSqlSessionTemplate extends SqlSessionTemplate { 
 private final SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory; 
 private final ExecutorType executorType; 
 private final SqlSession sqlSessionProxy; 
 private final PersistenceExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator; 
 private Map<Object, SqlSessionFactory> targetSqlSessionFactory; 
 public void setTargetSqlSessionFactory(Map<Object, SqlSessionFactory> targetSqlSessionFactory) { 
  this.targetSqlSessionFactory = targetSqlSessionFactory; 
 } 
 public EjsSqlSessionTemplate(SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory) { 
  this(sqlSessionFactory, sqlSessionFactory.getConfiguration().getDefaultExecutorType()); 
 } 
 public EjsSqlSessionTemplate(SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory, ExecutorType executorType) { 
  this(sqlSessionFactory, executorType, new MyBatisExceptionTranslator(sqlSessionFactory.getConfiguration() 
    .getEnvironment().getDataSource(), true)); 
 } 
 public EjsSqlSessionTemplate(SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory, ExecutorType executorType, 
         PersistenceExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator) { 
  super(sqlSessionFactory, executorType, exceptionTranslator); 
  this.sqlSessionFactory = sqlSessionFactory; 
  this.executorType = executorType; 
  this.exceptionTranslator = exceptionTranslator; 
  this.sqlSessionProxy = (SqlSession) newProxyInstance( 
    SqlSessionFactory.class.getClassLoader(), 
    new Class[] { SqlSession.class }, 
    new SqlSessionInterceptor()); 
 } 
 @Override 
 public SqlSessionFactory getSqlSessionFactory() { 
  SqlSessionFactory targetSqlSessionFactory = this.targetSqlSessionFactory.get(SqlSessionContextHolder.getDataSourceKey()); 
  if (targetSqlSessionFactory != null) { 
   return targetSqlSessionFactory; 
  } else if ( this.sqlSessionFactory != null) { 
   return this.sqlSessionFactory; 
  } 
  throw new IllegalArgumentException("sqlSessionFactory or targetSqlSessionFactory must set one at least"); 
 } 
 @Override 
 public Configuration getConfiguration() { 
  return this.getSqlSessionFactory().getConfiguration(); 
 } 
 public ExecutorType getExecutorType() { 
  return this.executorType; 
 } 
 public PersistenceExceptionTranslator getPersistenceExceptionTranslator() { 
  return this.exceptionTranslator; 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <T> T selectOne(String statement) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<T> selectOne(statement); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <T> T selectOne(String statement, Object parameter) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<T> selectOne(statement, parameter); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <K, V> Map<K, V> selectMap(String statement, String mapKey) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<K, V> selectMap(statement, mapKey); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <K, V> Map<K, V> selectMap(String statement, Object parameter, String mapKey) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<K, V> selectMap(statement, parameter, mapKey); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <K, V> Map<K, V> selectMap(String statement, Object parameter, String mapKey, RowBounds rowBounds) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<K, V> selectMap(statement, parameter, mapKey, rowBounds); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <E> List<E> selectList(String statement) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<E> selectList(statement); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <E> List<E> selectList(String statement, Object parameter) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<E> selectList(statement, parameter); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <E> List<E> selectList(String statement, Object parameter, RowBounds rowBounds) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.<E> selectList(statement, parameter, rowBounds); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void select(String statement, ResultHandler handler) { 
  this.sqlSessionProxy.select(statement, handler); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void select(String statement, Object parameter, ResultHandler handler) { 
  this.sqlSessionProxy.select(statement, parameter, handler); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void select(String statement, Object parameter, RowBounds rowBounds, ResultHandler handler) { 
  this.sqlSessionProxy.select(statement, parameter, rowBounds, handler); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public int insert(String statement) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.insert(statement); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public int insert(String statement, Object parameter) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.insert(statement, parameter); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public int update(String statement) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.update(statement); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public int update(String statement, Object parameter) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.update(statement, parameter); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public int delete(String statement) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.delete(statement); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public int delete(String statement, Object parameter) { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.delete(statement, parameter); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public <T> T getMapper(Class<T> type) { 
  return getConfiguration().getMapper(type, this); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void commit() { 
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Manual commit is not allowed over a Spring managed SqlSession"); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void commit(boolean force) { 
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Manual commit is not allowed over a Spring managed SqlSession"); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void rollback() { 
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Manual rollback is not allowed over a Spring managed SqlSession"); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void rollback(boolean force) { 
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Manual rollback is not allowed over a Spring managed SqlSession"); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void close() { 
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Manual close is not allowed over a Spring managed SqlSession"); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public void clearCache() { 
  this.sqlSessionProxy.clearCache(); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  */ 
 public Connection getConnection() { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.getConnection(); 
 } 
 /** 
  * {@inheritDoc} 
  * @since 1.0.2 
  */ 
 public List<BatchResult> flushStatements() { 
  return this.sqlSessionProxy.flushStatements(); 
 } 
 /** 
  * Proxy needed to route MyBatis method calls to the proper SqlSession got from Spring's Transaction Manager It also 
  * unwraps exceptions thrown by {@code Method#invoke(Object, Object...)} to pass a {@code PersistenceException} to 
  * the {@code PersistenceExceptionTranslator}. 
  */ 
 private class SqlSessionInterceptor implements InvocationHandler { 
  public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { 
   final SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession( 
     EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getSqlSessionFactory(), 
     EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.executorType, 
     EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator); 
   try { 
    Object result = method.invoke(sqlSession, args); 
    if (!isSqlSessionTransactional(sqlSession, EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getSqlSessionFactory())) { 
     // force commit even on non-dirty sessions because some databases require 
     // a commit/rollback before calling close() 
     sqlSession.commit(true); 
    } 
    return result; 
   } catch (Throwable t) { 
    Throwable unwrapped = unwrapThrowable(t); 
    if (EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator != null && unwrapped instanceof PersistenceException) { 
     Throwable translated = EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator 
       .translateExceptionIfPossible((PersistenceException) unwrapped); 
     if (translated != null) { 
      unwrapped = translated; 
     } 
    } 
    throw unwrapped; 
   } finally { 
    closeSqlSession(sqlSession, EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getSqlSessionFactory()); 
   } 
  } 
 } 
} 

2。自定義了一個(gè)注解

/** 
 * 注解式數(shù)據(jù)源,用來(lái)進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)源切換 
 * User:Amos.zhou 
 * Date: 14-2-27 
 * Time: 下午2:34 
 */ 
@Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE}) 
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) 
@Documented 
public @interface ChooseDataSource { 
 String value() default ""; 
} 

3.定義一個(gè)AspectJ的切面(我習(xí)慣用AspectJ,因?yàn)閟pring AOP不支持cflow()這些語(yǔ)法),所以在編譯,打包的時(shí)候一定要用aspectJ的編譯器,不能直接用原生的JDK。有些方法就是我基于以前Hibernate,JDBC動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)源的時(shí)候改動(dòng)的。

/** 
 * <li>類描述:完成數(shù)據(jù)源的切換,抽類切面,具體項(xiàng)目繼承一下,不需要重寫即可使用</li> 
 * 
 * @author: amos.zhou 
 * 2013-8-1 上午11:51:40 
 * @since v1.0 
 */ 
@Aspect 
public abstract class ChooseDataSourceAspect { 
 protected static final ThreadLocal<String> preDatasourceHolder = new ThreadLocal<String>(); 
 @Pointcut("execution(public * *.*(..))") 
 public void allMethodPoint() { 
 } 
 @Pointcut("@within(com.ejushang.spider.annotation.ChooseDataSource) && allMethodPoint()") 
 public void allServiceMethod() { 
 } 
 /** 
  * 對(duì)所有注解有ChooseDataSource的類進(jìn)行攔截 
  */ 
 @Pointcut("cflow(allServiceMethod()) && allServiceMethod()") 
 public void changeDatasourcePoint() { 
 } 
 /** 
  * 根據(jù)@ChooseDataSource的屬性值設(shè)置不同的dataSourceKey,以供DynamicDataSource 
  */ 
 @Before("changeDatasourcePoint()") 
 public void changeDataSourceBeforeMethodExecution(JoinPoint jp) { 
  //拿到anotation中配置的數(shù)據(jù)源 
  String resultDS = determineDatasource(jp); 
  //沒有配置實(shí)用默認(rèn)數(shù)據(jù)源 
  if (resultDS == null) { 
   SqlSessionContextHolder.setSessionFactoryKey(null); 
   return; 
  } 
  preDatasourceHolder.set(SqlSessionContextHolder.getDataSourceKey()); 
  //將數(shù)據(jù)源設(shè)置到數(shù)據(jù)源持有者 
  SqlSessionContextHolder.setSessionFactoryKey(resultDS); 
 } 
 /** 
  * <p>創(chuàng)建時(shí)間: 2013-8-20 上午9:48:44</p> 
  * 如果需要修改獲取數(shù)據(jù)源的邏輯,請(qǐng)重寫此方法 
  * 
  * @param jp 
  * @return 
  */ 
 @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") 
 protected String determineDatasource(JoinPoint jp) { 
  String methodName = jp.getSignature().getName(); 
  Class targetClass = jp.getSignature().getDeclaringType(); 
  String dataSourceForTargetClass = resolveDataSourceFromClass(targetClass); 
  String dataSourceForTargetMethod = resolveDataSourceFromMethod( 
    targetClass, methodName); 
  String resultDS = determinateDataSource(dataSourceForTargetClass, 
    dataSourceForTargetMethod); 
  return resultDS; 
 } 
 /** 
  * 方法執(zhí)行完畢以后,數(shù)據(jù)源切換回之前的數(shù)據(jù)源。 
  * 比如foo()方法里面調(diào)用bar(),但是bar()另外一個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)源, 
  * bar()執(zhí)行時(shí),切換到自己數(shù)據(jù)源,執(zhí)行完以后,要切換到foo()所需要的數(shù)據(jù)源,以供 
  * foo()繼續(xù)執(zhí)行。 
  * <p>創(chuàng)建時(shí)間: 2013-8-16 下午4:27:06</p> 
  */ 
 @After("changeDatasourcePoint()") 
 public void restoreDataSourceAfterMethodExecution() { 
  SqlSessionContextHolder.setSessionFactoryKey(preDatasourceHolder.get()); 
  preDatasourceHolder.remove(); 
 } 
 /** 
  * <li>創(chuàng)建時(shí)間: 2013-6-17 下午5:34:13</li> <li>創(chuàng)建人:amos.zhou</li> <li>方法描述 :</li> 
  * 
  * @param targetClass 
  * @param methodName 
  * @return 
  */ 
 @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") 
 private String resolveDataSourceFromMethod(Class targetClass, 
            String methodName) { 
  Method m = ReflectUtil.findUniqueMethod(targetClass, methodName); 
  if (m != null) { 
   ChooseDataSource choDs = m.getAnnotation(ChooseDataSource.class); 
   return resolveDataSourcename(choDs); 
  } 
  return null; 
 } 
 /** 
  * <li>創(chuàng)建時(shí)間: 2013-6-17 下午5:06:02</li> 
  * <li>創(chuàng)建人:amos.zhou</li> 
  * <li>方法描述 : 確定 
  * 最終數(shù)據(jù)源,如果方法上設(shè)置有數(shù)據(jù)源,則以方法上的為準(zhǔn),如果方法上沒有設(shè)置,則以類上的為準(zhǔn),如果類上沒有設(shè)置,則使用默認(rèn)數(shù)據(jù)源</li> 
  * 
  * @param classDS 
  * @param methodDS 
  * @return 
  */ 
 private String determinateDataSource(String classDS, String methodDS) { 
//  if (null == classDS && null == methodDS) { 
//   return null; 
//  } 
  // 兩者必有一個(gè)不為null,如果兩者都為Null,也會(huì)返回Null 
  return methodDS == null ? classDS : methodDS; 
 } 
 /** 
  * <li>創(chuàng)建時(shí)間: 2013-6-17 下午4:33:03</li> <li>創(chuàng)建人:amos.zhou</li> <li>方法描述 : 類級(jí)別的 @ChooseDataSource 
  * 的解析</li> 
  * 
  * @param targetClass 
  * @return 
  */ 
 @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"}) 
 private String resolveDataSourceFromClass(Class targetClass) { 
  ChooseDataSource classAnnotation = (ChooseDataSource) targetClass 
    .getAnnotation(ChooseDataSource.class); 
  // 直接為整個(gè)類進(jìn)行設(shè)置 
  return null != classAnnotation ? resolveDataSourcename(classAnnotation) 
    : null; 
 } 
 /** 
  * <li>創(chuàng)建時(shí)間: 2013-6-17 下午4:31:42</li> <li>創(chuàng)建人:amos.zhou</li> <li>方法描述 : 
  * 組裝DataSource的名字</li> 
  * 
  * @param ds 
  * @return 
  */ 
 private String resolveDataSourcename(ChooseDataSource ds) { 
  return ds == null ? null : ds.value(); 
 } 
} 

那么以上3個(gè)類,就可以作為一個(gè)公共的組件打個(gè)包了。

那么項(xiàng)目中具體 怎么用列?

4.  在項(xiàng)目中定義一個(gè)具體的AspectJ切面

@Aspect 
public class OrderFetchAspect extends ChooseDataSourceAspect { 
}

如果你的根據(jù)你的需要重寫方法,我這邊是不需要重寫的,所以空切面就行了。

5.配置spring,在上面的分析過程中已經(jīng)貼出了,基本上就是每個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),一個(gè)dataSource,每個(gè)DataSource一個(gè)SqlSessionFactory。最后配一個(gè)SqlSessionTemplate,也就是我們自己重寫的。再就是MapperScan了,大致如下(數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)連接信息已去除,包名為杜撰):

<bean id="dataSource" class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource" destroy-method="close"> 
</bean> 
<bean id="dataSourceTb" class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource" destroy-method="close"> 
</bean> 
<!-- 事務(wù)管理 --> 
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager"> 
 <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" /> 
</bean> 
<!-- 注解控制事務(wù) --> 
<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager"/> 
<bean id="sqlSessionFactory" class="org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionFactoryBean"> 
 <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/> 
 <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:mybatis.xml" /> 
 <property name="mapperLocations" value="classpath*:com/foo/bar/**/config/*mapper.xml" /> 
</bean> 
<bean id="sqlSessionFactoryTb" class="org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionFactoryBean"> 
 <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSourceTb"/> 
 <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:mybatis.xml" /> 
 <property name="mapperLocations" value="classpath*:<span >com/foo/bar</span><span >/**/configtb/*mapper.xml" /></span> 
</bean> 
<bean id="sqlSessionTemplate" class="com.foo.bar.template.EjsSqlSessionTemplate"> 
 <constructor-arg ref="sqlSessionFactory" /> 
 <property name="targetSqlSessionFactory"> 
  <map> 
   <entry value-ref="sqlSessionFactory" key="spider"/> 
   <entry value-ref="sqlSessionFactoryTb" key="sysinfo"/> 
  </map> 
 </property> 
</bean> 
<bean id="mapperScannerConfigurer" class="org.mybatis.spring.mapper.MapperScannerConfigurer"> 
 <property name="basePackage" value="com.foo.bar.**.mapper*" /> 
 <property name="sqlSessionTemplateBeanName" value="sqlSessionTemplate"/> 
</bean> 

6.具體應(yīng)用

@ChooseDataSource("spider") 
public class ShopServiceTest extends ErpTest { 
 private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ShopServiceTest.class); 
 @Autowired 
 private IShopService shopService; 
 @Autowired 
 private IJdpTbTradeService jdpTbTradeService; 
 @Test 
 @Rollback(false) 
 public void testFindAllShop(){ 
  List<Shop> shopList1 = shopService.findAllShop(); 
  for(Shop shop : shopList1){ 
   System.out.println(shop); 
  } 
  fromTestDB(); 
 } 
 @ChooseDataSource("sysinfo") 
 private void fromTestDB(){ 
  List<Shop> shopList = jdpTbTradeService.findAllShop(); 
  for(Shop shop : shopList){ 
   System.out.println(shop); 
  } 
 } 
} 

測(cè)試發(fā)現(xiàn) shopList1是從spider庫(kù)查出來(lái)的數(shù)據(jù),而fromDB則是從sysinfo中查出來(lái)的數(shù)據(jù)。 那么我們就大功告成。
要做到我以上功能,Spring AOP是做不到的,因?yàn)樗恢С諧flow(),這也就是我為什么要用AspectJ的原因。

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------再次分割線-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

好了,功能我們已經(jīng)實(shí)現(xiàn)了,你有沒有覺得很麻煩,這一點(diǎn)也不Spring的風(fēng)格,Spring的各個(gè)地方擴(kuò)展都是很方便的。那么我們看看,在SqlSessionTemplate中的什么地方改動(dòng)一下,我們就可以很輕松的實(shí)現(xiàn)這個(gè)功能列?大家可以理解了,再回去看一下源碼。

其實(shí),只要將源碼中的那個(gè)SqlSessionInterceptor的這句話:

final SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession( 
   SqlSessionTemplate.this.sqlSessionFactory, 
   SqlSessionTemplate.this.executorType, 
   SqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator); 

改為:

final SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession( 
     EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.getSqlSessionFactory(), 
     EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.executorType,     
		 EjsSqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator); 

保證 每次在產(chǎn)生Session代理的時(shí)候,傳進(jìn)去的參數(shù)都是調(diào)用getSqlSessionFactory()獲取,那么我們自定義的SqlSessionTemplate,只要重寫getSqlSessionFactory(),加多一個(gè)以下2句話:

private Map<Object, SqlSessionFactory> targetSqlSessionFactory; 
 public void setTargetSqlSessionFactory(Map<Object, SqlSessionFactory> targetSqlSessionFactory) { 
  this.targetSqlSessionFactory = targetSqlSessionFactory; 
 } 

那么就完全可以實(shí)現(xiàn)動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)源切換。  那么mybatis-spring的項(xiàng)目團(tuán)隊(duì)會(huì)這樣維護(hù)么? 我會(huì)以mail的方式與他們溝通。至于能否改進(jìn),我們不得而知了。

其實(shí)這也就引發(fā)一個(gè)關(guān)于面向?qū)ο笤O(shè)計(jì)時(shí)的思想,也是一直爭(zhēng)論得喋喋不休的一個(gè)問題:

    在類的方法中,如果要用到類的屬性時(shí),是直接用this.filedName  來(lái)操作,還是用  getFiledName() 來(lái)進(jìn)行操作?

其實(shí)以前我也是偏向于直接用this.屬性來(lái)進(jìn)行操作的,但是經(jīng)歷過這次以后,我想我會(huì)偏向于后者。

以上所述是小編給大家介紹的關(guān)于Spring3 + Mybatis3整合時(shí)多數(shù)據(jù)源動(dòng)態(tài)切換的問題,希望對(duì)大家有所幫助,如果大家有任何疑問請(qǐng)給我留言,小編會(huì)及時(shí)回復(fù)大家的。在此也非常感謝大家對(duì)億速云網(wǎng)站的支持!

向AI問一下細(xì)節(jié)

免責(zé)聲明:本站發(fā)布的內(nèi)容(圖片、視頻和文字)以原創(chuàng)、轉(zhuǎn)載和分享為主,文章觀點(diǎn)不代表本網(wǎng)站立場(chǎng),如果涉及侵權(quán)請(qǐng)聯(lián)系站長(zhǎng)郵箱:is@yisu.com進(jìn)行舉報(bào),并提供相關(guān)證據(jù),一經(jīng)查實(shí),將立刻刪除涉嫌侵權(quán)內(nèi)容。

AI